Close

Articles Posted in Personal Injury

Updated:

California Court Affirms Judgment that Contractor’s Employee Cannot Recover Tort Damages from Contractor’s Hirer

The California Court of Appeal recently issued an unpublished opinion in a case that posed the question of whether an injured worker had presented evidence sufficient to pursue a claim of vicarious negligence against the defendant, Amy’s Kitchen, Inc.  Amy’s kitchen hired an independent contractor, who then hired the plaintiff.…

Updated:

Jury Could Reasonably Find that Employee’s Psychological Injuries Resulted from Employer’s Decision to Stage Mock Robbery and Were Outside the Realm of the California Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity Rule

In an unpublished opinion, a California Court of Appeal addressed whether workers’ compensation served as the exclusive remedy for an employee psychologically harmed by her participation in a staged mock robbery. She was not aware it had been a training exercise.  On appeal, the issue was whether the jury had…

Updated:

California Court of Appeal Holds Plaintiff Failed to Show California Restaurant Owner Had a Duty to Take Preventative Measures to Protect Against Third-Party Harm to Plaintiff

The California Court of Appeal recently addressed whether the owner of a restaurant owed a duty to protect against harm caused by removing a snow grate. In this opinion, the court emphasized the balancing test of the foreseeability of harm against the burden imposed on a proprietor to protect against…

Updated:

California Supreme Court Holds that Employers or Property Owners Have Duty to Prevent Foreseeable Harm of Asbestos Exposure to Members of a Worker’s Household

Domestic exposure to asbestos takes place when workers come into contact with a toxin and carry it home on their clothing, resulting in a person or a family member suffering exposure due to their proximity with the worker (or their clothing).  Two lawsuits involving personal injury and wrongful death actions were consolidated by the California Supreme Court…

Updated:

California Appellate Court Affirms Judgment in Favor of Ralphs Market When Plaintiff Who Slipped and Fell Showed Only Trivial Defect

In a recent unpublished opinion regarding an underlying premises liability lawsuit, the California Court of Appeal upheld a judgment in favor of a Southern California supermarket chain after the plaintiff alleged a defective floor caused her to slip and fall and suffer injuries. The court reviewed the evidence presented before…

Updated:

Appellate Court Upholds Ratio of 10:1 Punitive to Compensatory Damages in California Lawsuit Alleging Fraud and Reprehensible Conduct by Life Insurance Company Following Plaintiff’s Accident

In a recent case before the Second Appellate District, the California Court of Appeal addressed whether an award of punitive damages comported with due process following a life insurance company’s alleged fraud and intentional conduct toward a disabled veteran.  At issue was whether the punitive damages award must be limited to…

Updated:

California Court Upholds Judgment in Favor of Regents of California Because Trial Court did not Improperly Instruct Jury Concerning the Kind of Injury That Plaintiff Suffered

In an unpublished opinion, the California Court of Appeal recently held in favor of the Regents of the University of California in an underlying personal injury lawsuit brought by a student who was seriously injured while riding his bike across campus. At issue in this appeal was whether the trial court…

Updated:

California Court Holds City Not Liable for Injuries to Girl Hurt on Swingset Because Structure Met Safety Guidelines, and City Had no Notice of Previous Incidents

In an unpublished opinion, the California Court of Appeal analyzed whether a motion for summary judgment was properly granted in favor of the City of Inglewood in a premises liability lawsuit brought on behalf of a minor injured on a playset swing.   The issue before the court was whether the…

Updated:

California Court Applies Going and Coming Rule in Lawsuit Involving Oil Rig Employee’s Vehicle

The California Court of Appeal recently addressed the issue of whether an employer can be held liable for injuries caused by an employee under the doctrine of respondeat superior.  In this unpublished opinion, the court assessed whether the going and coming rule applied to an employee who provided two other…

Updated:

California Appellate Court Upholds Reasonable Value of Medical Services for Uninsured Victim of Car Accident

Recently, the California Court of Appeal reviewed an appeal involving a personal injury plaintiff’s damages for past medical expenses. At issue was the reasonable value of medical services received by the plaintiff, who, at the time of the underlying motor vehicle accident, was uninsured. The court narrowed their decision, abiding…

Contact Us